Support and Resources For Pastors and
Christian Ministry Professionals
Thomas F. Fischer, M.Div., M.S.A., Editor
| MH Website Overview | Ministry Resources
| MH Archives | MH Dissertations
Pastors, Parishioners, and Pygmalion
Thomas F. Fischer, M.Div., M.S.A.
- Do churches mimic their pastors?
- That is the conventional wisdom. Yet it appears that this truism may, at best,
be overly simplistic. At worst, it may betray a hint of fantasy and clerical narcissism.
- Perpetuating The Notion
- Certainly there are positive reasons which may help perpetuate this notion.
- First, it "fits" the expected ideal of pastoral leadership. The sheep hear
their shepherd's voice and follow because they feel he's so much like them.
- Second, it helps to promote the importance of the character of the clergy. If a church
becomes like its pastors, then the conscientious pastor will want to be watchful of his
life and teaching as Paul exhorted Timothy.
- However, on the negative side, this notion of churches imitating their pastors is
- One wonders what measures or objective criteria could or should be used to assess the
diverse range of behaviors, attitudes, emotions and general overall "likeness"
to the pastor.
- Secondly, the notion that churches imitate their pastors, in many cases, appears to defy
reality. If churches did become like their pastors, why are pastors resigning, being
removed or otherwise seeking escape from the duress of congregations? Is it because the
church is becoming like its pastors? What a sad set of circumstances that would be if it
were true! Hmmm....
- Third, the notion may create and perpetuate unhealthy pastoral leadership expectations. While
on the one hand believing that churches mimic their pastors may give
the impression that the pastor has a great deal of talent and influence in a growing
church, on the other hand it may be a source of discouragement for any equally talented
pastor who may find himself in a difficult parish.
- Indeed, there is a reason why some of the country's most effective pastors failed in
their first churches. Rev. Robert Schuler is only one example of a virtual parade of
pastors who, having been unsuccessful and removed from their first church, went on to more
successful ministry in other settings.
- False-Positive Readings
- For "successful pastors," it may be an statement of pride that he has a church
"just like him." After all, which leader is so altruistic that they would refuse
any and all credit for ministry growth and "success?"
- But is it not possible for this claim to success to be a "false reading?" Are
there not churches which thrive--or at least maintain a healthy vigor--in spite of their
pastoral leadership? Could it be that they survived specifically because they did not
mimic their pastor?
- This does occur in some congregations, especially those with larger multiple paid staff.
In such congregations, the senior pastor may be adept at side-stepping the issues,
avoiding conflict, refusing decision-making, and engaging in otherwise escapist behavior
on a day-to-day basis. Whenever difficult issues arise, such pastors are either hiding in
the woodwork or behind a facade. Remaining passive in the background, pastors by
default let the lay leadership build the ministry. Only after the issues have been
resolved does these pastors emerge to claim "their" success.
- False-Negative Reading
- Another type of false reading is the false-negative. In this scenario, an exemplary,
creative and energetic pastor gives courageous charismatic leadership to an unresponsive,
dysfunctional congregation. Though limited success may occur, the congregation eventually
via passivity and or active conflict ignores, sidesteps, or destroys the success.
- The unfortunate result is two-fold: the congregation remains entrenched in their
accustomed ministry posture and the pastor gets a false negative reading of his abilities,
giftedness, and calling. Sometimes, these pastors may find themselves dealing with a sense
of incompetence and wallowing in discouragement and self-deprecation.
- Do churches really imitate their pastors?
- Certainly the relationships and interactions between pastors and their congregations are
not without complexities. Given such complexities, one may have good reason to wonder
whether the "Pygmalion" phenomena, so greatly popularized in the Rogers and
Hammerstein hit musical, "My Fair Lady," really is operative in the
- If Pygmalion is an operative organizational principle in congregations and other
organizations, some of the more obvious and logical questions to pose might include:
- "Which direction does the influencing go--from Pastor to parishioners...or from
parishioners to pastors...or a mixture of both?"
- "What percentage of the membership desires to mimic the pastor?"
- "What critical ratio of mimickers to non-mimickers is essential for the
organization to undergo the pygmalionic transition?
- "What factors are associated with a congregation's increased (or decreased)
potential to mimic their pastors and/or vice versa?"
- "Are there certain congregational events which help or hinder this
- Christian leaders, of course, will want to consider, of course, the most critical
and central organizational dynamic for the Christian church, namely, to what extent is the
power of God's Word and His will working through it really the major operant influence?
- Some Problems
- Like many truisms, the truism "congregations mimic their pastors" may raise
more difficulties and unanswered questions than it portends to solve.
- First, do the people in the church want to become like their pastor?
- Some may respect their pastor. But others may not want to at all. Still others will
despise everything about the pastor while others cannot but praise him. Are such typical
congregations with a basically "normal" distribution of protagonists,
antagonists, early innovators and laggards really able to ever perfectly imitate their
- Second, what are those elements which are to be considered subject to
"mimicking" and which are not?
- Personality? Spiritual Values? Life Values? Gifts and abilities? Given the scriptural
teaching of the diversity of gifts within the Body of Christ, it may not be a reasonable
hope or expectation for congregations to have cloned pluralities of their pastor.
- Third, there are some congregations which are so entrenched in their ways that no
pastoral personality could even remotely change them.
- Pastors can probably name in a moment those congregational organizations, groups, boards
or guilds that just de facto resist any of the pastors' suggestions. If the
cliché for our consideration is true, wouldn't these groups conform their will, desires,
goals and visions with that of the leader's?
- Fourth, the biblical accounts of leaders such as Jesus, weeping over Jerusalem, Isaiah
and other prophets, ministering to a people without "ears to hear," and Moses,
who had to oversee the extermination of an entire generation of people rebellious to him
and God, all demonstrate that the real power, influence and persuasion really is not man's
- Fifth, this cliché of pastoral influence overlooks the role of relational systems in
- From A Systems Perspective
- Congregations and pastors, together, comprise an organizational and relationship system.
- Systems, in general, tend to have at least two major characteristics:
* One, they
have a tendency to try to remain stable over time and,
* Two, they are highly resistant to
- Given these system tendencies, perhaps it is reasonable to ask:
- Can the pastor change these systems?
- Will these complex interaction of personalities characteristic of systems mimic him?
- Or is the extent of his ability somehow to appeal to those in the congregation who are
already like-minded and who may help to carry forth his agenda.
- Another major implication of a systems perspective is that systems tend to have--and
six essential system roles: the Hero, Enabler, Spiritual Leader, Lost Child, Mascot, and
Scapegoat. While virtually all systems contain these roles, the relative
dominance of each one may vary among systems.
- However, as systems tend to maintain equilibrium, the various roles--and
their respective strength within that system--will tend to remain constant
over the long haul. Short-term variations may occur. But, over the long-term
these roles are extremely persistent.
- Congregations in which the expected pastoral system role is the Hero may experience a
greater degree of imitating their hero than those whose expected pastoral system role is
the Scapegoat. Each system role carries varying degrees of influence. To the extent the
pastor can shift the congregational system to achieve a more influential system role may
also influence the degree to which the truism, "The congregation mimics its
pastor" is, indeed, true.
- The Pastor also comes to the congregation with his own system role expectations from his
own personal relationship system. What things may occur in a congregation which, expecting
a "Hero" for the position of pastoral leadership, instead receives an individual
who was a Lost Child or Scapegoat in his home?
- Some relationship systems in the church are, by nature, more outgoing, visionary,
active and sympathetic to the pastor. Others, however, are not...and never will be.
- Sixth, systems theory also describes how individuals fill various key roles in the small
group to maintain equilibrium in the system. Thus, it may not be that a church mimics their
pastor. Instead, what may really be happening is that pastors--as everyone else--will tend
to be closer to those individuals who best compliment their personalities, work styles,
system roles, etc.
- Some Observations
- 1. Congregations may or may not mimic their pastors.
- 2. The mimicking process may be a subtle projection of personality upon the congregation
over time, a direct planned educational process, or a combination of the two.
- 3. Mimicking may occur in one, several, or many select areas of ministry.
- 4. Pastors can also mimic congregations. This can occur for several
different reasons. In more cases than not, when this occurs it is almost
always signals a breakdown of self-differentiation, burn-out, and a general
loss of the pastor's sense of leadership and passion for ministry.
Pygmalion: Whom Shall We Mimic?
"Be imitators of God, therefore, as dearly loved
Ephesians 5:1 NIV
Amid all the distractions found in ministry, in life, and in
our sinful characters, it is often difficult to keep the right focus on our
holy "mimicry." Paul's words to the Ephesians stress that we ought
always imitate God. Why?
Not because it is easy. But because we are loved--dearly
loved--by God Himself.
As Christ went to the cross there were certainly many
distractions. There were many opportunities for mimicking something less
painful...than love. Even in His death and resurrection, He demonstrated a
focused example of love for us to mimic, pattern and follow.
There are three occurrences of the word "imitator"
(Gk: "mimetes") in the New Testament (Ephesians 5:1; I Thessalonians
1:6; and I Timothy 2:4). In all three occurrences the
"mimicking" occurs in the context of suffering. It appears that when
ministry gets excruciatingly tough one of the most important survival
mechanisms is simply to "imitate God."
Imitate God? Certainly we can't be holy as He is. But we can
try. Perhaps the greatest benefit of considering mimicking God is that it
forces us to examine Him, His loving nature, and His marvelous working through
us...in every area of our lives and ministry.
Whatever the circumstances of your ministry--and especially if
you are under extreme duress--consider this: Who--and what--are you
mimicking? Is it God and His often hard, but loving, plan for you? Or is
it the easy way of the world?
Imitate God, dearly loved one, and experience the fullness of
God's grace in, with and through you and others!
Thomas F. Fischer
Index Articles 1-49
Articles 50-99 Articles
100-149 Articles 150-199
200-249 Articles 250-299
Articles 300-349 Articles
Copyright © 1997-2004 Ministry
Health, LLC All Rights Reserved.
FrontPage and Microsoft Internet Explorer are registered trademarks of
Adobe Acrobat and PDF are registered trademarks of Adobe Systems
Hosted and Developed by SAMSA
was revised on:
Tuesday, October 05, 2004 11:02:58 PM